Where he isn't right is in his contention that the "ruling class" and the political class are the same thing, and in his statement that the big problem is that this ruling class presents an unbroken wall where "On many issues...the Republican and Democratic establishments agree." Anyone who has been paying even minimal attention the past several years is aware of the across-the-board gridlock resulting from irreconcilable Republican and Democratic views on things like health care, taxes, war, immigration, LGBT rights, climate change, the minimum wage, international relations, Medicare and Social Security. Both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have made reversing income inequality the cornerstones of their respective campaigns, for instance. In neither of the recent top-tier nor the second string Republican debates was one word spoken of it. The ruling class are the billionaires with the money. They work hard to game the system so that the political class are their puppets. The GOP almost completely is. The Democrats are not yet fully so.
There
is no question these candidates are indeed, as the author states,
tapping into an angst among the rank and file that feels increasingly
alienated from the political and/or ruling class. The root of the angst
is that the standard of living and opportunity ladder for average
Americans has stagnated for over three decades now. The problem of
focusing this discontent is that the disaffected are not of one mind.
The Tea Party types who like Trump (Cruz, Paul, Carson, et. al.) think
government is the problem and want to devolve it. The Leftish types who
like Sanders think corporatism and plutocracy are the problem and want
strong government under the people's control to rein in this
ruling class and force it to share the profits with the workers and
provide more opportunity (free college, medical care and so on) to the
average folks. It will be fascinating (maybe frightening) to see how
this eventually explodes.
Getting
the billionaire and corporate money out of the political campaign
process is, in my view, the prerequisite for heading off the explosion
and restoring better responsiveness. I am, as you likely know, in
sympathy with what I referred to as the Leftish analysis.
1 comment:
Enlightening analysis as usual. Some day I would like to dialogue with you about Chris Hedges point of view. He seems quite pessimistic, but still seems to hope that change is possible. But it won't, he emphasizes, be pretty.
Post a Comment