Liberals believe in equality before the law, and
they believe it for real rather than just paying lip service to the
concept. The Declaration of Independence
famously states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal…” Liberals like Abraham
Lincoln believed that meant slavery was inconsistent with the principles of
freedom. “No man is good enough to
govern another man, without that man’s consent,” he said. Conservatives looked for reasons to create
exceptions. Surely, they felt, equality,
though a good concept for white, Christian, property-owning men, could not
apply to blacks, people of other non-Caucasian races, slaves, Jews, Hindus,
women and the landless. All couldn’t
really mean “all,” could it?
The Fourteenth
Amendment avows, “No State shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.” Liberals
like Elizabeth Cady Stanton believed that meant women, as well as men, deserved
the right to vote. It took 72 years and
a constitutional amendment, the Nineteenth, to accomplish that. Some, such as conservative Supreme Court
Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, still don’t think the equal protection clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment requires equal rights for women. Here is what he said about it: “In 1868, when the 39th Congress was debating
and ultimately proposing the 14th Amendment, I don't think anybody would have
thought that equal protection applied to sex discrimination, or certainly not
to sexual orientation. So does that mean that we've gone off in error by
applying the 14th Amendment to both? Yes,
yes. Sorry, to tell you that.” So, we
still have people, even prominent ones, looking for reasons to deny equal
rights.
Liberals, on the other hand, take the wording at
face value. No one can be denied equal
rights, period. In proposing legislation
to end the racial discrimination against African-Americans in his day,
President John F. Kennedy observed, “We are confronted primarily with a moral
issue.” Kennedy based his views on
strong sources. Where should we search
for the right answer to this issue? He
said, "It is as old as the Scriptures and is as clear as the American
Constitution. The heart of the question
is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal
opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to
be treated.” His answer, based on both,
was an emphatic “Yes!” Modern liberals
are proud to emphatically agree.
The uncompromising liberal view of equality has
therefore been applied in a wider and wider circle over the centuries. The principle was clearly enunciated in the
beginning of the country, but was not realized in many people’s daily
lives. The pursuit of the dream to bring
Jefferson’s words to fruition continues in our own time, concentrating now most
urgently on the LGBT community. This
unfinished work shows liberalism at its best.
Carved over the entrance to the Supreme Court building are the words
“EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW.” The views of
certain retrograde Associate Justices not withstanding, that is what liberals
continue to strive for, confident in the ultimate realization of America's egalitarian founding ethos. As Martin Luther King declared, "the moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward justice."
2 comments:
I'm enjoying this series so far Steve. Looking forward to more. I couldn't help laugh however, when you characterized Abraham Lincoln, a Republican, as a liberal. Not that I think it's funny, but I think Republicans would be stumbling all over themselves denying that real possibility. I think Abraham Lincoln, if he were alive today would not recognize his own party.
You caught on to me, Paul! Abe Lincoln was the first Republican president, and today he would be identified as a liberal. He was for national rights over state rights and supported all kinds of government initiatives to spur growth, such as the Intercontinental Railroad, Homestead and Land Grant College Acts.
Post a Comment