Monday, August 13, 2012

The Ryan Pick

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate clearly marks the direction his campaign will take.  Ryan, the House budget chair, is a true believer in cutting taxes for the wealthy and paying for them by slashing support for students, the elderly and the poor.  The Ryan pick will thus energize GOP Tea Party supporters and elate Wall Street but will alienate just about everyone else.

Representative Ryan (R-Wisconsin) is smart, well-spoken and looks like the guy next door.  What he stands for, however, is the same supply-side ideology that has served few others than the top 1%.  His famous proposed budget  envisions reducing the top tax rate from 35% to 25% and the capital gains rate charged on income like stocks to zero.  People like Romney would pay virtually no tax at all under Ryan's plan.

In order to still try to cut expenses in the face of such large revenue reductions, Ryan would put a cap on Medicare and turn it into a voucher program in which seniors would have to go out and try to find insurance for themselves.  Since the Obama health plan with its requirements that people be eligible for insurance regardless of pre-existing conditions would be repealed under a Romney-Ryan administration, you can imagine what luck the typical 80-year-old would have in trying to buy insurance on the open market.  According to the congressional Budget office, the plan would cost seniors an additional $6500 a year--all so that millionaires and billionaires could enjoy greater tax breaks. 

There would be other cuts too, to Medicaid, education, student loans, food stamps, infrastructure and much else.  He asks for many sacrifices from those who can least afford it in order to shower benefits on those who already have it made.  The upshot of Ryan's addition to the ticket is that it plays right into the Obama campaign's characterization of Romney as out of touch with the average American and concerned only with the welfare of the rich.  The President has already begun making these points and highlighting Ryan's other budget ideas on the trail in Iowa today.

Representative Steve Israel, (D-New York) chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign, is suddenly very optimistic about picking up House seats in November.  He said today that Democratic candidates should concentrate on three issues this fall: "Medicare, Medicare and Medicare."

It is difficult to see how Ryan's draconian outlook will help the GOP ticket with undecided and swing voters.  The dynamics of the election are starting to look a lot like 1996, when Bill Clinton won re-election over another Republican team featuring a lead candidate with a lot of shortcomings and a number two known as an idea man whose ideas upon examination proved to be highly unpopular.  In those days it was Bob Dole and Jack Kemp.  Nowadays the team of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, running against another Democratic incumbent, face many of the same problems.  It is likely Gov. Romney has hurt his chances more than helped them with this choice.

3 comments:

Paul Myers said...

The big difference between 1996 and 2012 is the economy though. The Reagan admonishment of "Are you better off than you were four years ago" will work well for a lot of voters in this country. The Democratic team needs to make sure that people understand that they will be even worse off under a Romney/Ryan administration.

Steve Natoli said...

Yes, good point. Obama could make the case that the job losses were rapidly staunched and turned into modest gains once his stimulus was passed. But then came Republican control of the House and the ability to block all the rest of his jobs initiatives since. That may be true but I'm not sure how well it sells. What do you think?

Paul Myers said...

Blame Congress has worked in the past. Harry Truman whistle stopped across the country using that theme throughout in 1948 and "upset" Thomas Dewey, so the blame Congress could work.

I love how Republicans say it's still a Democratically controlled Congress. How can it be considered a Democratically controlled Congress, when you need a supermajority of 60 to get anything accomplished. That, is the big problem in the Senate in my opinion. Get rid of that and you'll get some legislation passed.

Blame Congress could go a long way, but I think in the long way, I think he needs to energize Democratic voters to get out there and vote.