"Liberally Speaking" Video

Pages

Sunday, February 24, 2008

More Middle Class Squeeze

Thanks to some good comments on yesterday's post I decided to do some additional research. As Webfoot put it, "Is the middle class being squeezed because of the economics of the times or are they being squeezed by their own injudicious use of their own resources?" Mr. H. added, "I completely agree with Webfoot's comments about the middle class propensity toward instant gratification and consumerism. Most of the debt incurred is not necessary." On the other hand Don wrote, "I agree fully with your comments about the attack on our middle class, (see the book Nickeled and Dimed in America) but do you think the average citizen understands what is happening?" This discussion is important and deserves some investigation.

I looked into four cost components I feel are significant factors in the middle class standard of living and are rather essential for maintaining it: housing, health care, gasoline and college tuition. Here's what I found.

Home prices were an average of three times per capita income in the 1970s. This had risen to 5 times PCI in the 1980s and stands at 9 times today. In California and Florida these had risen as high as 13 times PCI, though the recent falloff has reduced that to 11. These figures come from the Wall Street Journal and the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. It is clear that housing costs have tripled as a share of income over the period in question.

Health care has risen from 5% of American gross domestic product in 1960 to 13% in 2000 and 16% in 2006. The cost per capita stood at $7026 in 2006. These data come from the Agency for Health Research and Quality and the American Medical Association. As in the previous example, U.S. resources devoted to this cost have tripled as a percentage of available resources. That is a direct cost to those middle class Americans who are self-employed or must otherwise buy their own coverage and an indirect cost to the salary compensation of those who are employed by others.

Gasoline prices in constant 2007 dollars stood at $1.50 per gallon before the first Arab oil embargo of 1973. They rose to $1.80 in 1974. They stand today at a national average of $3.31. These figures come from Z-facts and the American Automobile Association. The price rise in real terms in this case is 2.21 times the earlier cost, not as high as for the previous two categories but still a substantial drain on a family's discretionary funds.

College tuition and fees at public four-year universities cost, on average, 8% of annual per capita family income in 1975. By 2005 it had risen to 21%. For private universities the respective figures are 31% and 80%. Note that these figures considerably understate the full costs since they do not include books and living expenses or the effect of reduced scholarship availability for the middle class. Even so, what we see here has increased 2.63 times over its previous bite from the family income.

In sum, it looks to me as though the middle class squeeze is quite real. I grant that these are subjectively chosen markers but I would contend they are all expensive yet essential components of maintaining a middle class lifestyle. I, too look with amazement at people who are not wealthy yet buy non essentials like absurdly expensive sneakers, televisions, video game systems and motor vehicles. It would indeed be welcome to hear more voices advising the American consumer to exercise considerably more restraint and responsibility as a counterweight to the constant drumbeat to buy, buy, buy. One recalls President Bush's response when asked what Americans could do to help in the wake of 9/11, "Go shopping."

But with that all said, it is inescapably evident from these enormous increases in real terms that the economic facts of life make it far more difficult for people today to enter and stay in the middle class than it was for their parents and grandparents a generation ago. And I am quite convinced that if these trends are not reversed the societal effects will be profoundly destructive in a number of ways.

5 comments:

  1. Hello Mr. Natoli,

    I am so glad that the Times Delta ran an article about your blog. Actually this is the first time that I have visited a blog site and what a grand experience! I truly appreciate your comments because you seem to be writing objectively and reference the source of your information. You are educating your readers.

    It would be interesting to know what advanced psychology has to say about resisting current marketing techniques (short of turning off the TV or subscribing to TIVO). I would like to know how the responder's children are doing since they cut to one working parent. My daughter and her husband have moved into the foothills about 8 miles from a town and too far away from neighbors with children to play daily and are home schooling. Their three boys are active in church and home school group sojourns so are not being raised "in a void".
    They also do not have a TV. This is how one of my family members is trying to cope. However, I am very concerned how these boys will do when it comes time to immerse them in society.

    I am looking forward to following your blog, not just about middle class but regarding the presidential campaign.

    Thank you for you efforts on our behalf, Lee

    ReplyDelete
  2. To Lee,

    My wife quit work when my daughter was born. We homeschooled all three of our children for five years before my wife re-entered the work force again as a private school teacher.

    My oldest is a well adjusted college freshman, majoring in violin performance. She eventually wants to play for a major orchestra somewhere.

    My middle child is thriving in high school and has lettered in cross country for three years in a row. I have no idea what he wants to do as he really hasn't shared any plans for college or beyond with us yet. I suspect that he'll end up at our local community college and find himself, much like I did when I was his age.

    Our youngest is in 7th grade and enjoying life in general. He has plans to major in some kind of science in college and wants to be a teacher when he grows up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you Webfoot for your comments about your family. Sounds like you and your wife worked your plan well and the children are going to do well.

    I believe that my grandsons will do well but have my fingers crossed. It is really a joy to see innocence in children and just being kids and my daughter is giving them a chance to have both longer than many children.

    I am enjoying your blog Mr. Natoli.

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the compliment, Lee. Glad to have you on board.

    ReplyDelete